Rutgers University (Rutgers University) New research from 2009 to 2017 after Control Engineering Copyright , for the “great recession” (Great Recession) of the United States study the effects of robotics and automation on the economy, employment and wages. It was found that nearly 10 years of strong economic recovery whitewash the robot impact on the overall job market, a weak low level of education of labor has not completely replaced Control Engineering Copyright , but I am afraid that more low-paid. The study pointed out that the use of robots in the United States from 2007 to 2009 a sharp drop during the “great recession”, but after 2009 CONTROL ENGINEERING China Copyright , the industry began to increase automation, improve the nation’s robots use again.
Statistics show that from 2009 to 2017 the number of US industrial robots grew more than two times the ratio of labor and manufacturing robots rose to 1.974 units from 0.813 per thousand on stage. In terms of a regional perspective, especially in the Midwest highest robot density, at least 2 times that of other areas. Also during this time, significant US job growth and stable , the economic recovery, although the plant by increasing the number of robots, some groups of workers to improve the hiring rate has also followed, including education to a lesser extent young men, and less educated adult women, but their salary level is declining. Summing up the findings, although the robot era has indeed arrived, but almost no (or not yet) led to evidence that human work is replaced by a robot. However, there is a winner at automation trends and losers, although the robot has little effect on the nation’s overall employment, but there are indeed differences industries, regions and population groups in extent. In addition, the reduction of jobs caused by the robot, the reason has little effect on the overall employment rate, probably because in a robust economy and low unemployment environment, labor even after being replaced by still find other jobs, but the pay may be lower . It also shows that, over the past 10 years of economic recovery is probably gloss over the part of the impact caused by the robot labor. That is, not the robot does not replace human work out, but overallThe degree of economic expansion large enough to offset the loss of the opportunity to work out. The researchers note that most automated by means of observing the rise of the influence of the Midwest minority and female workers, as well as their owners and are living in the community, will contribute to economic, social and cultural areas other robots bring the impact of pre-preparation.